Conservatism is Empirical. So is Our Group Strategy.

Conservatism is Empirical (critical). SO it is natural for us to patiently let some idea fail, and then outlaw it via the common law once it’s become obvious.

We can outlaw the abuse of free speech and return to the oath of truth telling. We can require the warranty of due diligence. We can punish offenders.

This behavior is consistent with the preservation of sovereignty by preventing rule.

It is also consistent with our lack of a written philosophy other than the law, and truth.

It is easy to write down trivial methods of producing social order. It is hard to write down indirect methods of social order.

We evolved an indirect social order.

So just as it was easiest to produce mathematics, harder to produce physics, and harder to produce social science (economics), it was harder to write down the western political model.

Physical law, Natural Law, Common law, truth, testimony, jury, judge, property and sovereignty.

This is extremely difficult for people to undrestand. Why? Becuase like truth, it is a critical system of operation: we know not what is right, we only discover what is wrong.

This is the west.

We invented science in all fields because we practiced it in heart, hearth, home, myth, legend, thang, and jury.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/APZJS

Economic Thinking = Full Accounting

Economic thinking (equilibrialism), which can also be referred to as ‘full accounting’, is unnatural since humans minds evolved a bias toward recalling ‘what worked last time’, not ‘what is true” or “what is complete”. We are pretty good at moral intuitions – not imposing costs physically (crimes), interpersonally (Ethics) or by externality (morals). But we are not able to explain those intuitions in rational terms as other than feelings taht physical (criminal), interpersonal (ethical) and external (moral) costs are somehow bad. Economics gives us this language.

However, economics can be used to IMPROVE this information, or it can be used to DISTORT this information. The difference between mainstream economics(rule-by-credit) and austrian economics (institutions of cooperation) is that the way Austrians seek to improve our lot is by improving information without criminal, unethical, or immoral policy. While mainstream economics forgives criminal, unethical, and immoral policy if it suits socialistic (collectivist) ends.

Full accounting of costs tell us that the net balance of mainstream economics is dysgenia, and the net balance of Austrian economics is eugenic.

For obvious reasons it is not possible under democracy to make use of the traditional western eugenic policies. Whereas democracy mandates that dysgenic policies will be followed – nothing else is possible.

Democracy = Dysgenia, Aristocracy (meritocracy) = Eugenia.

It’s not complicated. But the consequences are profound.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/AdYOG

Feeding a Movement

When feeding a movement you must always supply fresh content.

This is one of the reasons one does not release the full strategy all at once in a big bang, but rolls it out a little at a time – always building momentum.

The opposition can raise a wall of gossip and shame around a fixed argument but if we stay ahead of the curve they cannot.

This is one of the reasons I try to issue suggestive statements about a presumed direction while actually pursuing another.

Feed a movement. Don’t lead it.

An army marching in the same direction is predictable.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/PeFms

Hazard Creation (Entrapment) As a Group Evolutionary Strategy

We should point out that Tunnel Spider Ethics, and Ghetto ethics, and the use of SEX TO BAIT MEN, are all hazard creators. And that any population (tribe, race, nation) that specializes in feminine strategy, and evolves sufficient right-distribution of the intelligence curve, will develop talents at feminine entrapment: gossip, bait, and parasitism.

This is an extremely unpleasant topic.

So look in the mirror at what westerners have done.

We conquer people, and use upward redistribution to domesticate them and expand the population until it is almost entirely middle class.

So make sure you use comparative ethics when you criticize one group so that you are aware of what yoru group does.

We are all competitors.

Cooperation just makes competition more beneficial for us than conflict is for the lesser beings.

All we do is right-shift the competitive curve.

We should have continued our domestication of man.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/kX4By

Why I don't Condone Racism

WHY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM
1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to fully human, and from fully human to our image of gods, if they merely suppress the rates of reproduction of their lower classes.
2) Classes (distributions) matter far more than race. Among elites in all races the primary differences across cultures appear to be verbal acuity – the ability to precisely articulate ideas.
3) As far as I can tell if people are fully integrated AND middle class or above (>105 IQ), and especially if they can obtain an empirical education (>110-115), they present no long term problem in small numbers because they try to obtain the benefits of membership in OUR society rather than attempt to obtain rents and political power on the behalf of their lower classes.
4) blaming others for our failings is simply an excuse not to act to change the status quo. the reason we are being invaded is the man in the mirror. States can only do what the warrior class (lower and middle class men) allow them to do.

CAVEAT
I recognize that I am an elite and that interact with the global elite and that as such my intuitionistic concern is different from that of our middle and lower classes. I know my bias is to be more ‘forgiving’.

On the other hand if we build a worldwide alliance against corporatism and return to familialism, tribalism, and nationalism, it does not matter if we are different – it just provides us more opportunity to experiment.

And moreover, with many small nations there is MORE ROOM AT THE TOP than there is in a ‘new world order’.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/l42i1

All Groups Are 'Different' Morally, Including Jews.... and Westerners

—“Are Jews, (Gypsies, Arabs, Asians, Polynesians) inherently different, morally?”—

Every group is different morally because every group modifies its strategy as needed in order to compete. Virtue is a competitive strategy, not necessarily an intrinsic good.

a) Jews appear fairly constant in lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine)

b) the religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation. (They have this because they cannot create a warrior caste necessary to hold territory.) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’.

c) Because of what I suspect are verbal bias, and feminine bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’. The most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (and this is something that is fascinating and worth study).

1) Scriptural Monotheism
2) Dual Ethics
3) Pseudoscience.
4) Propaganda (postmodernism)
5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism)

Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale.

Once you understand it, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it.

Truth is enough.

We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud.

It’s just time to tame fraud.

Blaming them for specializing in fraud is like blaming women for specializing in extracting resources from us, or others blaming us for specializing in war and innovation.

Tame fraud: Testimonialism.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/a1cVQ

What I Tell Ukrainians About America

The Great Lies

1) America is just as corrupt as Ukraine, it is just much wealthier. Wealth hides many sins.

2) Great Lie 1: Democracy produces prosperity. Democracy is a luxury good, and the luxury is the product of Rule of Law. Democracy is not in and of itself a good. It is merely a method of distributing the proceeds from rule of law.

3) Great Lie 2: American violence. American violence problems are the product of our black and hispanic minorities, and that white crime is the same as in europe.

4) Great Lie 3: American happiness. Americans are very lonely people who have lost family and relations by moving around for work. Something like 40% of american women take anti-depressants. One of the leading causes of death of men over 50 is suicide from loneliness. Americans live alone or nearly alone in big empty houses. They use the television for fake friends. They are extremely status conscious and try to feel good about their lonely existences by overeating and consumption of consumer goods. The american economy is the result of conquering a continent and selling it off first to europeans then the second worlders and now to their worlders. This economy is dependent almost entirely on the financialization of the housing sector.

The origin of american prosperity comes from these factors:
1) the population was more german than anglo. OR at best 50/50.
2) the split in german civilization between the british and the germans happened in about 1830, and prior to that england was another german civilzation. America was more german than british.
3) We had a ruling class from the british and dutch upper class, who imported and refined british rule of law. We had a farming, working and martial class of germans.
4) Cheap land, rule of law, and financializatino of the sale of land to immigrants is the source of american prosperity.
5) The american revolution was an attempt to escape paying for the french and indian war that nearly bankrupted the crown. Americans started off as tax cheats.
6) The american civil war was not about slavery but about control of the western territories, which would have adopted slavery and united with the south against the north, leaving the north politically weakened, and a minority ruled from the south. (and you must remember that the south is largely from the lower classes of britain (scotts/irish), while the north from the middle and east of england.)
7) America was wrong to assist in constraining germany in both wars. Germany is the core state of western civilization.
8) American neo-conservative adventurism is a jewish not anglo or german movemnet within america.
9) The postwar consensus was this: we must never have another world war. To prevent a world war all states will be collectively forced (a) to stay within their borders, (b) to build their economies (c) to extend human (property) rights. The american policing of this policy was this: (a) you have the right to self determination – as long as you choose good world citizenship and construct a consumer capitalist economy rather than a militarily expansionist economy. (b) but if you choose poorly we will punish the hell out of you and your government. (c) Americans advocated democracy but what they meant was consumer capitialsm. Unfortunately, democracy is a ‘bad’ and has demonstrated itself to be a ‘bad’. Consumer capitalism has demonstrated itself to be a good.
10) America was able to defeat the world communism by requiring oil be purchased in US dollars, thereby allowing the USA to tax the developed world for the rapid increase in military spending, that the much poorer soviets could not match. Europe scammed the USA on this and cheated on paying the tax by developing the euro and paying for oil in euros. Ergo americans can no longer afford to pay to defend europe – or the world.
11) Iran was the fist to break the postwar consensus in a constant attempt to evolve into the core state of islamic cilvilizatino. Russia second by invading ukraine. China third by expansion into the south china seas. At this point the postwar consensus is broken and the USA is not wealthy and powerful enough to restore it.

UKRAINE
Ukraine is a failed state. But it is not a failed people.
All we need in ukraine is:
a) Post soviet educational reform.
b) lustration of, and replacement of the bureaucracy.
c) lustration of, and replacement of the courts.
d) Rule of law, consumer credit, and ten years.
e) the buy back or shared interests between the oligarchs and the people on land.

But most of all we need a militia of volunteers who will kill every living soul that engages in corruption and does not assist in lustration.

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2Y4k9

Interview on ICTV

Four years ago programmer-philosopher Curt Doolittle decided to leave America for Ukraine. He sold everything in Seattle and here in Ukraine creating a new business.”

(4 роки тому програміст-філософ Курт Дулітл вирішив творити Америку в Україні. Чоловік продав усе, що мав у Сієтлі і тепер налагоджує власний бізнес.)
http://fakty.ictv.ua/ua/index/view-media/id/128663

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/3GEha

Interview today.

Curt’s Background is interesting and unusual. :)  He left the US and moved to Ukraine. He created a business, which will soon launch and be visible to everyone.  :)   And he calls Ukraine – his home.”

( Історія Курта цікава і незвичайна) Він залишив США і переїхав в Україну. Тут створив бізнес, про який скоро дізнаються усі)  А ще він називає Україну – рідною країною) )

12923138_1049263328476167_3253403128824095253_n

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/TrJ1R

Demand from Mothers, not Politicians.

So they Reporter asks me “What do you have to say to our politicians about corruption?”

I said something along the lines of “nothing. All politicians are corrupt.” Then “The reason they get away with corruption is the person in the mirror: you let them.” Then ” So, I have something to say to Ukrainian mothers: raise your sons to fight for liberty, or you shall never have liberty.”

 

URL:http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/X547K